Analysis of the Ways in Which Coetzee’s Choices Shape Meaning and Create Effects on Waiting for the Barbarians (1980)

☕ Download Study Guide

Analysis of the Ways in Which Coetzee’s Choices Shape Meaning and Create Effects on Waiting for the Barbarians (1980)

Coetzee’s craft is deceptively simple. His prose appears transparent, almost journalistic, yet every formal choice – from the novel’s structure to its use of silence – contributes to its devastating effect. This section analyses the specific techniques Coetzee employs and explains how they shape meaning.

First‑Person Unreliable Narration and the Limits of Empathy: 

The choice to narrate through the Magistrate’s consciousness is the novel’s most significant formal decision. We see everything through his eyes, hear only his voice, share his confusion and his guilt. This creates intense identification – we are inside his mind, experiencing his moral struggle. But it also imposes radical limitations. We never know what the barbarian girl thinks or feels. Her silence is not a flaw; it is the point. Coetzee refuses to pretend that a white male narrator can speak for a colonised woman. The novel’s form enacts its political argument: empathy has limits, and representation is always partial. The Magistrate’s unreliability is equally important. He admits to forgetting, to not understanding, to being uncertain. His memory fails him. He cannot decipher the ancient script. He cannot read the girl’s body. These admissions of failure are not weaknesses in the narrative; they are Coetzee’s way of acknowledging the impossibility of fully knowing the other.

Allegorical Defamiliarisation: 

By refusing to name the Empire or specify its location, Coetzee employs a technique called defamiliarisation – making the familiar strange so that we see it anew. A novel set in “South Africa” might have been read as a documentary, its events attributed to a particular regime. But an unnamed Empire could be any empire: Roman, British, Dutch, American, Soviet. The novel’s power lies in its universality. The defamiliarisation also forces readers to do interpretive work. We cannot passively consume the story; we must ask what the Empire represents. This active engagement is central to Coetzee’s ethical project. He wants readers to question, not to consume.

Minimalist Prose and the Aesthetics of Restraint: 

Coetzee’s prose is famously spare. He favours short sentences, concrete nouns, active verbs. He avoids adjectives and adverbs, trusting the reader to supply emotional responses. Consider the description of the public beating: “Four of the barbarians are forced to kneel on the ground. Joll rubs dust into their backs and with a stick of charcoal writes the word ‘enemy’.” The sentences are short, the verbs are active, the details are clinical. Coetzee does not tell us that the scene is horrifying; he lets the facts speak for themselves. This restraint is more powerful than any amount of description. By refusing to sensationalise violence, Coetzee makes us feel it more deeply. We must imagine what he leaves out, and our imagination is more vivid than any words could be.

Symbolism as Compression: 

Coetzee uses symbols to compress complex ideas into concrete images. Colonel Joll’s dark glasses are the most famous example. They symbolise his refusal to see – to see the humanity of his victims, to see the consequences of his actions, to see anything that might disturb his certainty. But they also symbolise the Empire’s self‑imposed blindness. The Magistrate asks, “Is he blind?” – a question that applies equally to the entire imperial system. The desert symbolises the space outside the Empire, the realm of the other. It is harsh, indifferent, and purifying. The Magistrate’s journey into the desert is a symbolic death and rebirth. The recurring dream of children playing in the snow represents innocence, but also coldness, death, and the impossibility of return. The children melt away when the Magistrate approaches; he cannot grasp them. This image of irretrievable loss haunts the entire novel.

Strategic Silence and the Unrepresented Other: 

The barbarian girl speaks only a few words in the entire novel. She has no name, no interiority, no narrative agency. This silence has been controversial. Some critics accuse Coetzee of replicating the colonial silencing of indigenous women. Others argue that the silence is a deliberate strategy: the girl cannot be represented by the Magistrate’s narrative, and Coetzee is honest enough to admit that limitation. Her silence is a rebuke to his presumption. The novel’s form thus enacts a political humility: the white male writer cannot speak for the colonised woman. The best he can do is to show his own failure to understand. This is a courageous artistic choice, even if it is also a frustrating one.

Intertextuality and the Cavafy Echo: 

The title alludes to Cavafy’s poem, in which a city waits for barbarians who never arrive. Coetzee’s novel is structured around the same ironic expectation. The Empire waits for an attack that never comes. The Magistrate waits for retirement. The girl waits for the Magistrate to decide what to do with her. The novel’s final paragraph is a meditation on waiting: “One thought alone preoccupies the submerged mind of the Empire: how not to end, how not to die.” The intertextual echo enriches the novel’s meanings without overwhelming its originality. Readers familiar with Cavafy will recognise the irony; those who are not will still feel the weight of waiting.

Temporal Dislocation and the Dream Sequences: 

The novel’s chronology is linear but interrupted by dream sequences that blur the boundary between past and present, waking and sleeping. The Magistrate’s dreams of children in the snow are not memories – he never experienced such a scene – but they feel more real than his waking life. These dreams function as windows into his unconscious, revealing desires and fears he cannot articulate. They also disrupt the novel’s realistic surface, introducing an element of the surreal. The melting children are a haunting image of loss and irretrievability. The dream sequences also suggest that the Magistrate’s psychological trauma is deeper than his conscious mind can process.

Metafictional Framing: 

The novel begins and ends with the Magistrate writing – or trying to write. In Part One, he records his experiences in a journal, aware that he is creating a document that may outlive him. In Part Three, he attempts to write a history of the settlement but finds he cannot remember clearly. This metafictional framing draws attention to the novel as a constructed narrative. Coetzee is asking: what does it mean to write history? Whose stories get told? The Magistrate’s failure to write is not a failure of the novel; it is the novel’s most honest moment. Some traumas cannot be represented. Some stories cannot be told. The silence at the end is the only authentic response.